Australia passes a world first law: No social media for under 16s

A key step in protecting teen mental health?

Recently, the Australian Parliament passed a widely discussed bill that bans individuals under the age of 16 from using most social media platforms, making Australia one of the strictest countries in the world when it comes to regulating minors’ internet usage. The legislation aims to address mental health issues caused by teenagers’ excessive reliance on social media and seeks to provide legal support for parents and schools in managing these concerns.

Getty Images A teenage girl lying on a bed using a smartphone in a dark room

(photo source: Getty Image)

Why is this bill necessary?

With the widespread use of smartphones and the rapid growth of social media platforms, an increasing number of studies suggest that excessive use of these platforms may have a negative impact on teenagers’ mental health.

An Australian survey revealed that over 50% of teenagers reported feeling stressed because of social media, while 30% admitted to experiencing anxiety or depression due to online bullying or constant comparison.

At the same time, parents and teachers are facing growing challenges. Many parents say they struggle to monitor their children’s online habits, and schools are concerned that students are distracted during lessons and unable to disconnect even after class.

Key Provisions of the Bill

The bill includes the following key points:

1️⃣ Teenagers under the age of 16 are banned from using platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat.
2️⃣ Companies that violate the law may face hefty fines up to AUD 50 million.
3️⃣ The law does not apply to instant messaging services or platforms that don’t require user logins, such as WhatsApp, YouTube, and online gaming platforms.

In addition, tech companies are required to implement effective age verification technologies, including ID checks and AI powered biometric recognition, to ensure users meet the age requirements.

High school student poses with his mobile phone showing social media applications in Melbourne

(photo source: Reuters/Asanka Brendon Ratnayake)

Support and Opposition

The new bill has sparked widespread public debate since its announcement. Supporters believe it is an important measure to protect the healthy development of minors.

However, criticism cannot be ignored. Some experts worry that overly strict bans may push teenagers to use more hidden platforms and could further weaken communication between parents and their children.

A spokesperson for youth rights groups said, “Legislation should educate rather than punish. A complete ban will only make the problem more complicated.”

Some scholars also warned that the ban might isolate LGBTQIA youth or immigrant teenagers from their online support networks.

The Australian Human Rights Commission stated that the law could infringe on young people’s human rights and hinder their ability to participate fully in society.

🌎 Reference Cases from Other Countries

In fact, other countries have also tried to limit teenagers’ social media usage in terms of time or method. For example:

  • France: Teenagers under 16 must obtain parental consent to create social media accounts.

  • United States: Utah attempted to pass a similar bill but it was overturned due to concerns over freedom of speech.

What makes Australia’s legislation unique is its strict enforcement, especially the hefty fines and technological verification measures, marking a global first.

The Australian Human Rights Commission stated that the law could infringe on young people’s human rights and hinder their ability to participate fully in society.

🎤 Voices of Teenagers

The key group affected by this legislation the teenagers themselves have shown mixed reactions.

Some feel it infringes on their freedom: “Social media isn’t just entertainment; it’s how we stay connected with our friends.”

Others worry that the law might push them to “find ways to bypass the system,” potentially creating even greater risks.

⚖️ Responses from Tech Companies

Major tech companies have expressed mixed reactions to the new legislation:

  • Meta: Criticized the law as rushed and difficult to enforce, questioned the feasibility of age verification technology, and warned that excessive restrictions could pose risks.
  • Snapchat: Supports the goal of protecting teenagers and will comply with the regulations but hopes for more flexible legal details to avoid unnecessary obstacles.
  • TikTok: Stated that the government’s definition of “social media” is too vague, potentially encompassing nearly all online services.

Conclusion

Australia’s new legislation marks a significant attempt to protect the mental health of teenagers, but its true impact remains to be seen. Success will require joint efforts from the government, businesses, schools, and families, as well as teenagers developing strong self management skills in navigating the digital world.

What is your take on this ban? Do you think it will effectively address the issues, or could it lead to even greater challenges?